Thoughts on my dinner at Gordon Ramsay at the London:
- This is exactly the place to take people who love food, but not necessarily a destination for foodies.
- The food I was served could not have been better prepared.
- Like an Olympic dive that could never get a ten because of its low degree of difficulty, the perfection is a bit perplexing. Nothing was so original or inspired as to amaze, but at the same time each component of each dish was exceptional in quality and execution.
- The room, if described in parts, would sound busy, but as experienced comes together much like the food: it is warm and intimate enough to be alive, while leaving the space to enjoy your meal and your company comfortably.
- The swivel chairs are by far the best seating I have encountered in a fine restaurant.
- There are aspects of the room that feel like the subtlest interpretations of Western motif, particularly the some wagon wheel-esqe chandeliers and bridle-y wall hangings.
- All in all the place feels like one of the greatest values in town on a dollars-spent-to-experience-provided ratio.
- Go because you want fine food, not because you want to be awed.
Menu Prestige with lamb choice, the porn:
Augie,
I read that GR said he would ban a customer that took photos of the food. Did anyone care that you were snapping away?
Molto E
Posted by: molto e | November 18, 2006 at 08:53 AM
Because it was the first seating of the first night in the dining room, and I didn’t want to distract the staff from their jobs or from anyone’s dining, I shot without flash, so my couple of snaps were probably unnoticed, even by some at my table. But as always happens on special nights in special places, by the end of first service people were getting up and gathering around tables to pose and shooting each other with flashes. Occasion dining is what this place is all about and occasions for most the people of the world are marked by photography; only a very self-important, unsure, curmudgeon of a diner or restaurant owner would begrudge that.
All that being said, I read the article in which Chef Ramsay said this wasn’t a “pictures of food” place when it came out months ago, and I understood him to be saying he didn’t want his food on a pedestal, not that he hated people saving mementos of their time at his restaurant. No one works as hard at pleasing people as Chef Ramsay obviously does just to pull stunts as stupid as kicking people out for reveling in a good time. Ramsay seems to have an aura about him as a hard guy or something, I have heard he acts the fool on a couple of TV shows and grabbed himself press by kicking a reviewer out of a restaurant in London years ago or some such thing. Not being a guy who really cares about dining advice beyond the recommendations of some trusted compatriots, and having little more than contempt for prime time TV, I can’t speak to this reputation. I can say I ate the food of a journeyman chef, that obviously aspires and succeeds at the top level, and was served it by the most pleasant young woman who had traveled here from London with her chef after a long history with him, both of which speak to the opposite of a guy who finds it interesting to get upset by photography.
Posted by: augieland | November 19, 2006 at 01:22 PM
A life changing moment for me was Gordon Ramsey at Claridges, London. I experienced three star gastronomy, but I utterly appreciate your comments on The London. I think the emphasis on quality of composite ingredients is typical Ramsey, and a fantastic nudge of what is to come from him stateside.
Posted by: Christie DeGama | November 21, 2006 at 05:33 PM
With regards to the Claridges post - of course what you didn't experience was 3 star gastronomy. For whatever reasons Michelin may have, it was 1 star and no more.
Which brings up a very major point. Ramsay has been unable to reproduce his 3 Michelin stars anywhere else - unlike Ducasse, of course, who seems to be able to do little else - despite training a number of talented people. Rather than transfer any of them to New York, he has sent the very capable - but on his own, entirely unproven - Neil Ferguson. He's young, skilled, and given how infrequently Ramsay will be in the restaurant, any day to day success will really be on his shoulders.
Posted by: Moby | December 04, 2006 at 01:09 AM